Project 1: final submission feedback

Edit criterion description

Overall score

Edit rating Delete rating

(3pts) Excellent

5+ specifications are marked as E, all others as M

Edit rating Delete rating

(2pts) Meets expectations

All specifications are marked as M

Edit rating Delete rating

(1pt) Revisions needed

No more than 5 specifications are marked as U, all others are R+

Edit rating Delete rating

(0pt) Unassessable

Nothing was submitted or more than 5 specifications are rated as U

Edit criterion description

The notebook includes a markdown cell at the top with the project title, the people who worked on the project, and a description of the purpose of the notebook

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

Polished, aesthetically pleasing, and extremely clear

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

Includes all required information

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

Missing some of the information or in the wrong format (e.g., in a code cell instead of a Markdown cell)

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

Missing entirely or barely attempted

Edit criterion description

The code for scraping the required information about U.S. States from Wikipedia

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

The code runs and is accurate, well written (clear identifier names, efficient, pythonic), and well documented

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

The code runs and is accurate; some documentation is included

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

The code is present, but is poorly documented, doesn't run, isn't complete, or isn't accurate

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

Missing entirely or barely attempted

Edit criterion description

URLs are respectfully fetched from the web

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

A reasonable pause (~1 second) is made before each request. Pages are cached locally so as to avoid the unnecessary re-retrieval of pages when an error is encountered.

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

A reasonable pause is made before requests. Caching may have been attempted, but is incomplete or inaccurate.

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

A pause is made, but it is not sufficiently long.

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

Missing entirely or barely attempted

Edit criterion description

Notebook organization

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

The notebook is clearly organized, well documented, and aesthetically pleasing

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

The notebook is follows a logical sequence

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

The notebook has some organization, but is inconsistent or disorganized in places

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

The notebook wasn't submitted or is lacking any sensible organization, or not enough of an attempt was made to assess

Edit criterion description

Notebook execution

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

The notebook runs successfully from top to bottom

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

The notebook cells are ordered sequentially, but one or two do not run causing the notebook to not entirely execute

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

The notebook cells must be run out of sequence, and/or many of the code cells do not run

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

The notebook wasn't submitted, or few coding cells work, or not enough of an attempt was made to assess

Edit criterion description

Question 1

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

The question is clearly and accurately answered. The quested is stated and answered in a Markdown cell that is correctly formatted (heading, etc.). The supporting code is located just below the Markdown cell and is accurate, bug free, well documented, and well styled.

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

Contains most of the elements of "Excellent", but additional work is necessary to meet all of the elements.

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

Contains some of the elements of "Excellent", but needs significant work to bring it up to "Excellent"

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

Missing entirely or barely attempted

Edit criterion description

Question 2

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

The question is clearly and accurately answered. The quested is stated and answered in a Markdown cell that is correctly formatted (heading, etc.). The supporting code is located just below the Markdown cell and is accurate, bug free, well documented, and well styled.

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

Contains most of the elements of "Excellent", but additional work is necessary to meet all of the elements.

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

Contains some of the elements of "Excellent", but needs significant work to bring it up to "Excellent"

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

Missing entirely or barely attempted

Edit criterion description

Question 3

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

The question is clearly and accurately answered. The quested is stated and answered in a Markdown cell that is correctly formatted (heading, etc.). The supporting code is located just below the Markdown cell and is accurate, bug free, well documented, and well styled.

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

Contains most of the elements of "Excellent", but additional work is necessary to meet all of the elements.

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

Contains some of the elements of "Excellent", but needs significant work to bring it up to "Excellent"

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

Missing entirely or barely attempted

Edit criterion description

Question 4

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

The question is clearly and accurately answered. The quested is stated and answered in a Markdown cell that is correctly formatted (heading, etc.). The supporting code is located just below the Markdown cell and is accurate, bug free, well documented, and well styled.

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

Contains most of the elements of "Excellent", but additional work is necessary to meet all of the elements.

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

Contains some of the elements of "Excellent", but needs significant work to bring it up to "Excellent"

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

Missing entirely or barely attempted

Edit criterion description

Question 5

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

The question is clearly and accurately answered. The quested is stated and answered in a Markdown cell that is correctly formatted (heading, etc.). The supporting code is located just below the Markdown cell and is accurate, bug free, well documented, and well styled.

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

Contains most of the elements of "Excellent", but additional work is necessary to meet all of the elements.

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

Contains some of the elements of "Excellent", but needs significant work to bring it up to "Excellent"

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

Missing entirely or barely attempted

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

Description of criterion

Range

threshold: 5 pts

Edit rating Delete rating

5 pts

Full Marks

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

No Marks

pts

5 pts

--

Project 1: final submission feedback

Rubric

Rubric