Project 2: draft

Edit criterion description

Overall score

Edit rating Delete rating

(3pts) Excellent

No more than 2 specs are marked as "Meets requirements", the rest are "Excellent"

Edit rating Delete rating

(2 pts) Meets expectations

No more than 2 specs are marked as "Revisions needed", the rest are "Meets requirements" or "Excellent"

Edit rating Delete rating

(1 pt) Revisions needed

No more than 1 spec is "Not assessable", the rest are "Revisions needed" or above.

Edit rating Delete rating

(0 pts) Unassessable

Two or more of the specs are "Unassessable".

Edit criterion description

The notebook includes a markdown cell at the top with the project title and the people who worked on the project.

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

Polished, aesthetically pleasing, and extremely clear

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

Includes all the required information

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

Missing some of the information or in the wrong format (e.g., in a code cell instead of a Markdown cell)

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

Missing entirely or barely attempted

Edit criterion description

Notebook self-containment

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

The notebook is completely self-contained; it assumes the project2-data.bz2 file is present in the same directory as the notebook and requires no outside processing

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

The notebook is self-contained, but may require some extra work to place the input file (project2-data.bz2) into the correct directory

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

The notebook relies on external scripts or external operations to run

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

The notebook wasn't submitted or there is an insufficient amount of the notebook completed to assess

Edit criterion description

Notebook execution

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

The notebook runs successfully from top to bottom

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

The notebook cells are ordered sequentially, but one or two do not run causing the notebook to not entirely execute

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

The notebook cells must be run out of sequence, and/or many of the code cells do not run

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

The notebook wasn't submitted, or few coding cells work, or not enough of an attempt was made to assess

Edit criterion description

Notebook organization

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

The notebook is clearly organized, well documented, and aesthetically pleasing; questions are clearly labeled and their answers are presented in an appropriate, easy to read fashion (e.g., tables, plots, or formatted strings, complete with analyses when asked for)

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

The notebook is follows a logical sequence

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

The notebook has some organization, but is inconsistent or disorganized in places

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

The notebook wasn't submitted or is lacking any sensible organization, or not enough of an attempt was made to assess

Edit criterion description

Partner

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

A pair of students are working on the project; the partners are clearly indicated at the top of the notebook

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

--

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

--

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

The notebook wasn't submitted or is the product of a solo effort

Edit criterion description

Question 1

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

The question is clearly marked with Markdown, includes the relevant code to answer the question (in a runnable code cell), and the answer is displayed and clearly labeled; the answer is accurate

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

The code to generate the answer is runnable and the answer produced is accurate, but is not clearly marked

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

The code to produce the answer is present, but the answer is incorrect

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

The code to produce the answer is not present

Edit criterion description

Question 2

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

The question is clearly marked with Markdown, includes the relevant code to answer the question (in a runnable code cell), and the answer is displayed and clearly labeled; the answer and analysis are accurate

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

The code to generate the answer is runnable and the answer produced is accurate, but is not clearly marked; the analysis is cursory

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

The code to produce the answer is present, but the answer is incorrect; the analysis is missing or inaccurate

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

The code to produce the answer is not present

Edit criterion description

Question 3

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

The question is clearly marked with Markdown, includes the relevant code to answer the question (in a runnable code cell), and the plot is displayed and clearly labeled; the plot and analysis are accurate

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

The code to generate the plot is runnable and the plot produced is accurate, but is not clearly marked; the analysis is cursory

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

The code to produce the plot is present, but the plot is inaccurate; the analysis is missing or inaccurate

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

The code to produce the plot is not present

Edit criterion description

Question 4

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

The question is clearly marked with Markdown, includes the relevant code to answer the question (in a runnable code cell), and the plot is displayed and clearly labeled; the plot and analysis are accurate

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

The code to generate the plot is runnable and the plot produced is accurate, but is not clearly marked; the analysis is cursory

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

The code to produce the plot is present, but the plot is inaccurate; the analysis is missing or inaccurate

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

The code to produce the plot is not present

Edit criterion description

Question 5

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

The question is clearly marked with Markdown, includes the relevant code to answer the question (in a runnable code cell), and the plot is displayed and clearly labeled; the plot and analysis are accurate

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

The code to generate the plot is runnable and the plot produced is accurate, but is not clearly marked; the analysis is cursory

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

The code to produce the plot is present, but the plot is inaccurate; the analysis is missing or inaccurate

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

The code to produce the plot is not present

Edit criterion description

Question 6

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

The question is clearly marked with Markdown, includes the relevant code to answer the question (in a runnable code cell), and the plot is displayed and clearly labeled; the plot and analysis are accurate

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

The code to generate the plot is runnable and the plot produced is accurate, but is not clearly marked; the analysis is cursory

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

The code to produce the plot is present, but the plot is inaccurate; the analysis is missing or inaccurate

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

The code to produce the plot is not present

Edit criterion description

Question 7

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

The question is clearly marked with Markdown, includes the relevant code to answer the question (in a runnable code cell), and the plot is displayed and clearly labeled; the plot and analysis are accurate

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

The code to generate the plot is runnable and the plot produced is accurate, but is not clearly marked; the analysis is cursory

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

The code to produce the plot is present, but the plot is inaccurate; the analysis is missing or inaccurate

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

The code to produce the plot is not present

Edit criterion description

AI use

Edit rating Delete rating

Excellent

No AI generated code is present.

Edit rating Delete rating

Meets expectations

--

Edit rating Delete rating

Revisions needed

--

Edit rating Delete rating

Unassessable

The notebook wasn't submitted or is the product of a solo effort, or there is evidence of AI generated code.

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

Description of criterion

Range

threshold: 5 pts

Edit rating Delete rating

5 pts

Full Marks

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

No Marks

pts

5 pts

--

Project 2: draft

Rubric

Rubric