This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Overall score
_1431
threshold:
5
to >3.0 pts
(3pts) Excellent
No more than 2 specs are marked as "Meets requirements", the rest are "Excellent"
blank
3
to >2.0 pts
(2 pts) Meets expectations
No more than 2 specs are marked as "Revisions needed", the rest are "Meets requirements" or "Excellent"
_8664
2
to >0.0 pts
(1 pt) Revisions needed
No more than 1 spec is "Not assessable", the rest are "Revisions needed" or above.
_6702
0
to >0 pts
(0 pts) Unassessable
Two or more of the specs are "Unassessable".
blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
The notebook includes a markdown cell at the top with the project title and the people who worked on the project.
_7130
threshold:
5
to >3.0 pts
Excellent
Polished, aesthetically pleasing, and extremely clear
_25
3
to >2.0 pts
Meets expectations
Includes all the required information
_4085
2
to >0.0 pts
Revisions needed
Missing some of the information or in the wrong format (e.g., in a code cell instead of a Markdown cell)
_581
0
to >0 pts
Unassessable
Missing entirely or barely attempted
_8509
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Notebook self-containment
_9329
threshold:
5
to >3.0 pts
Excellent
The notebook is completely self-contained; it assumes the project2-data.bz2 file is present in the same directory as the notebook and requires no outside processing
_2673
3
to >2.0 pts
Meets expectations
The notebook is self-contained, but may require some extra work to place the input file (project2-data.bz2) into the correct directory
_4196
2
to >0.0 pts
Revisions needed
The notebook relies on external scripts or external operations to run
_1926
0
to >0 pts
Unassessable
The notebook wasn't submitted or there is an insufficient amount of the notebook completed to assess
_9242
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Notebook execution
_6802
threshold:
5
to >3.0 pts
Excellent
The notebook runs successfully from top to bottom
_4867
3
to >2.0 pts
Meets expectations
The notebook cells are ordered sequentially, but one or two do not run causing the notebook to not entirely execute
_6175
2
to >0.0 pts
Revisions needed
The notebook cells must be run out of sequence, and/or many of the code cells do not run
_6179
0
to >0 pts
Unassessable
The notebook wasn't submitted, or few coding cells work, or not enough of an attempt was made to assess
_6742
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Notebook organization
_1265
threshold:
5
to >3.0 pts
Excellent
The notebook is clearly organized, well documented, and aesthetically pleasing; questions are clearly labeled and their answers are presented in an appropriate, easy to read fashion (e.g., tables, plots, or formatted strings, complete with analyses when asked for)
_4316
3
to >2.0 pts
Meets expectations
The notebook is follows a logical sequence
_8038
2
to >0.0 pts
Revisions needed
The notebook has some organization, but is inconsistent or disorganized in places
_4389
0
to >0 pts
Unassessable
The notebook wasn't submitted or is lacking any sensible organization, or not enough of an attempt was made to assess
_196
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Partner
_4728
threshold:
5
to >3.0 pts
Excellent
A pair of students are working on the project; the partners are clearly indicated at the top of the notebook
_5802
3
to >2.0 pts
Meets expectations
--
_2186
2
to >0.0 pts
Revisions needed
--
_6593
0
to >0 pts
Unassessable
The notebook wasn't submitted or is the product of a solo effort
_3739
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Question 1
_1063
threshold:
5
to >3.0 pts
Excellent
The question is clearly marked with Markdown, includes the relevant code to answer the question (in a runnable code cell), and the answer is displayed and clearly labeled; the answer is accurate
_8690
3
to >2.0 pts
Meets expectations
The code to generate the answer is runnable and the answer produced is accurate, but is not clearly marked
_2802
2
to >0.0 pts
Revisions needed
The code to produce the answer is present, but the answer is incorrect
_1986
0
to >0 pts
Unassessable
The code to produce the answer is not present
_2547
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Question 2
_2462
threshold:
5
to >3.0 pts
Excellent
The question is clearly marked with Markdown, includes the relevant code to answer the question (in a runnable code cell), and the answer is displayed and clearly labeled; the answer and analysis are accurate
_8189
3
to >2.0 pts
Meets expectations
The code to generate the answer is runnable and the answer produced is accurate, but is not clearly marked; the analysis is cursory
_4879
2
to >0.0 pts
Revisions needed
The code to produce the answer is present, but the answer is incorrect; the analysis is missing or inaccurate
_9696
0
to >0 pts
Unassessable
The code to produce the answer is not present
_5868
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Question 3
_5731
threshold:
5
to >3.0 pts
Excellent
The question is clearly marked with Markdown, includes the relevant code to answer the question (in a runnable code cell), and the plot is displayed and clearly labeled; the plot and analysis are accurate
_778
3
to >2.0 pts
Meets expectations
The code to generate the plot is runnable and the plot produced is accurate, but is not clearly marked; the analysis is cursory
_810
2
to >0.0 pts
Revisions needed
The code to produce the plot is present, but the plot is inaccurate; the analysis is missing or inaccurate
_4067
0
to >0 pts
Unassessable
The code to produce the plot is not present
_1839
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Question 4
61410_6631
threshold:
5
to >3.0 pts
Excellent
The question is clearly marked with Markdown, includes the relevant code to answer the question (in a runnable code cell), and the plot is displayed and clearly labeled; the plot and analysis are accurate
61410_7589
3
to >2.0 pts
Meets expectations
The code to generate the plot is runnable and the plot produced is accurate, but is not clearly marked; the analysis is cursory
61410_6703
2
to >0.0 pts
Revisions needed
The code to produce the plot is present, but the plot is inaccurate; the analysis is missing or inaccurate
61410_5474
0
to >0 pts
Unassessable
The code to produce the plot is not present
61410_9785
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Question 5
61410_9983
threshold:
5
to >3.0 pts
Excellent
The question is clearly marked with Markdown, includes the relevant code to answer the question (in a runnable code cell), and the plot is displayed and clearly labeled; the plot and analysis are accurate
61410_9260
3
to >2.0 pts
Meets expectations
The code to generate the plot is runnable and the plot produced is accurate, but is not clearly marked; the analysis is cursory
61410_4244
2
to >0.0 pts
Revisions needed
The code to produce the plot is present, but the plot is inaccurate; the analysis is missing or inaccurate
61410_5776
0
to >0 pts
Unassessable
The code to produce the plot is not present
61410_7739
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Question 6
61410_5203
threshold:
5
to >3.0 pts
Excellent
The question is clearly marked with Markdown, includes the relevant code to answer the question (in a runnable code cell), and the plot is displayed and clearly labeled; the plot and analysis are accurate
61410_2348
3
to >2.0 pts
Meets expectations
The code to generate the plot is runnable and the plot produced is accurate, but is not clearly marked; the analysis is cursory
61410_1033
2
to >0.0 pts
Revisions needed
The code to produce the plot is present, but the plot is inaccurate; the analysis is missing or inaccurate
61410_1137
0
to >0 pts
Unassessable
The code to produce the plot is not present
61410_7368
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Question 7
61410_3029
threshold:
5
to >3.0 pts
Excellent
The question is clearly marked with Markdown, includes the relevant code to answer the question (in a runnable code cell), and the plot is displayed and clearly labeled; the plot and analysis are accurate
61410_5562
3
to >2.0 pts
Meets expectations
The code to generate the plot is runnable and the plot produced is accurate, but is not clearly marked; the analysis is cursory
61410_2590
2
to >0.0 pts
Revisions needed
The code to produce the plot is present, but the plot is inaccurate; the analysis is missing or inaccurate
61410_4221
0
to >0 pts
Unassessable
The code to produce the plot is not present
61410_4263
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
AI use
61410_2305
threshold:
5
to >3.0 pts
Excellent
No AI generated code is present.
61410_9737
3
to >2.0 pts
Meets expectations
--
61410_4919
2
to >0.0 pts
Revisions needed
--
61410_7183
0
to >0 pts
Unassessable
The notebook wasn't submitted or is the product of a solo effort, or there is evidence of AI generated code.
61410_2625
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Description of criterion
threshold:
5 pts
5
to >0 pts
Full Marks
blank
0
to >0 pts
No Marks
blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
/
5 pts
--
Total Points:
70
out of 70
Find Rubric